In Commonwealth v. Vasquez, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that although the judge erred in admitting evidence of prior misconduct by the defendant that resembled his conduct in the present case, the error did not create a substantial likelihood of a miscarriage of justice. The background was as follows. “[T]he…
Articles Posted in Law Commentary
SJC Holds Warrantless Search Conduction Outside of Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction Unlawful
The Appeals Court recently issued a decision in Commonwealth v. Luna reversing the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress items seized during the warrantless search of his vehicle. The reversal was based on the ground that “the Springfield police exceeded their territorial jurisdiction” by conducting the search in…
Appeals Court Finds Warrantless Entry Jusitified Under Emergency Exception
In Commonwealth v. Arias, the Appeals Court reversed the trial judge’s allowance of the defendant’s motion to suppress and held that the warrantless entry by the police into the apartment building where the defendant resided was justified under the emergency aid doctrine. The basic facts were as follows. “[T]he Lawrence…
SJC Rules Trial Error Admitting Evidence of CODIS Match Harmless
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision in Commonwealth v. Sullivan affirming the defendant’s conviction of first degree murder, despite the fact that testimony about an apparent match between DNA from the crime scene and the defendant’s DNA profile in the CODIS database should not have been admitted. The background…
SJC Rules New Trial Necessary Where Question of Sleeping Jurors Raised
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision in Commonwealth v. Villalobos, which addressed issues related to sleeping jurors. The SJC reversed the defendant’s convictions because the judge failed to respond adequately to a report that two jurors had been asleep during portions of the trial. The background was as…
Appeals Court Rules Drug Dealer Profiling Evidence Admissible
In a recent decision – Commonwealth v. Smith – the Appeals Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, the Appeals Court rejected the defendant’s contention that the testimony of a police expert on drug use and distribution “was admitted improperly because it was based on hearsay…
Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Makes Changes to Sentencing Guidelines
The Massachusetts Sentencing Commission recently approved a series of changes to the Massachusetts Sentencing Guidelines. The general formula (criminal history and offense level) for calculating a sentence range has remained the same, but the new guidelines have a number of major changes. The key changes are as follows: The Commission recommends…
Appeals Court Decision Affirms Negligent Operation Conviction on Minimal Evidence
In a recent Appeals Court decision, Commonwealth v. Ross, the Appeals Court ruled that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The background was as follows. At 9:50 p.m., a police officer observed the defendant driving his vehicle at a high rate…
Appeals Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Under “No Fix Statute”
In Commonwealth v. O’Leary, a divided panel of the Appeals Court reversed the trial court judge’s order “dismissing a multiple-count indictment [which charged the defendant with various motor vehicle offenses] on the ground that the police failed to make a timely delivery of the citation pursuant to G.L. c.90C, §2.”…
SJC Rules In Court Identification Permissible If Out of Court Identification is Unequivocal
In Commonwealth v. Dew, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of masked armed robbery, ruling that the judge properly admitted evidence of the victim’s out-of-court show-up identification of the defendant, and concluding concluded that the judge properly allowed the victim to make an in-court identification of the defendant.…