Close

Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog

Updated:

No Sex Offender Registration for Defendant Convicted of Two Open Gross Charges Adjudicated in Same Proceeding

In Commonwealth v. Wimer, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the defendant did not have to register as a sex offender because his two convictions for sex offenses – specifically, two convictions for open and gross lewdness – were adjudicated during the same proceeding, such that he did not have…

Updated:

US Supreme Court Rules that Police Must Get Search Warrant for CSLI Records

In a recent decision – Carpenter v. United States – the United States Supreme Court ruled that under the Fourth Amendment, the government must obtain a warrant supported by probable cause in order to procure from a telecommunication company the historical cell-site location information (CSLI) for a cellular telephone. The background…

Updated:

Appeals Court Reverses Conviction Due to Trial Court’s Failure to Allow Appropriate Number of Peremptory Challenges

In Commonwealth v. Crayton, the Appeals Court reversed the defendant’s convictions of possession of child pornography because the judge erroneously “deprived [the defendant] of eight peremptory challenges to which he was entitled during the first phase of the [bifurcated] trial.” The background was as follows. A “grand jury returned two…

Updated:

Appeals Court Weighs in On Authentication of Text Messages

In Commonwealth v. Alden, the Appeals Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of intimidating a witness, ruling that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant was not improper even though it referred to facts that were not in evidence. The background was as follows. “The victim in the case, E.B., was the…

Updated:

US Supreme Court Weighs in On What Restitution a Defendant Can be Ordered to Pay

The U. S. Supreme Court recently ruled in Lagos v. United States that ruled that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 requires the restitution of expenses incurred during a victim’s participation in government proceedings, as opposed to proceedings conducted by the victim. The background was as follows. Petitioner Lagos “was convicted…

Updated:

US Supreme Court Rules that Automobile Exception to Warrant Requirement Does not Extend to Curtilage of a House

In Collins v. Virginia, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that “the automobile exception [to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement] does not permit [a police] officer without a warrant to enter a home or its curtilage in order to search a vehicle therein.” The background was as follows. An officer…

Updated:

SJC Affirms Motion to Dismiss OAS After OUI Charge

In Commonwealth v. Nascimento, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the dismissal of a complaint charging the defendant with operating a motor vehicle after his license had been administratively suspended for OUI on the ground that the statute under which the defendant was charged (G.L. c.90, §23, third par.) did not…

Updated:

SJC Vacated Conviction Due to Improper Denial of Discovery Motions, Jury Instructions, and Redaction of Medical Records

The SJC vacated the defendant’s stalking conviction in Commonwealth v. Torres because the judge erred (1) by denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 for production of records in the Attorney General’s office pertaining to the complainant’s application to the victim compensation program; (2) by giving the…

Updated:

SJC Reverses Conviction for Unlawful Possession of Loaded Firearm on Grounds that Evidence was Insufficient to Establish Knowledge

The Supreme Judicial Court reversed the defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a loaded firearm, G.L. c.269, §10(n), in Commonwealth v. Brown because the evidence was insufficient to prove that the defendant knew that the firearm discovered by the police in the vehicle driven by the defendant was loaded. The background…

Updated:

SJC Affirms Conviction Where Defendant Raised Concerns of Biased Juror

In Commonwealth v. Lee, the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of first-degree murder, rejecting the defendant’s contention that the judge seated a biased juror, thereby violating the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. The background was as follows. The victim was the defendant’s father. A woman…

Contact Us