Close

Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Appeals Court Suppress Evidence from Stop Based on Civil Infraction, Possession of Marijauna

The Appeals Court’s recent decision in Commonwealth v. Martin reversed the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized by the police after they made a warrantless entry into a residence “while chasing the defendant, who [had] fled … during a stop for a civil infraction of marijuana possession.” The…

Updated:

U.S. Supreme Court Weighs in on Forfeiture Proceedings

The United States Supreme Court recently reversed a judgment of the Sixth Circuit in Honeycutt v. United States. In the decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1), which mandates forfeiture of property derived from certain drug crimes under federal law, “a defendant may [not] be…

Updated:

Appeals Court Clarifies Commonwealth’s Ability to Request 58A Hearing at OUI Third Arraignments

In a recent decision, Commonwealth v. Dayton, the Supreme Judicial Court responded to a reported question: whether, under G.L. c.276, §58A, a defendant who is charged with OUI third offense, must have three prior OUI convictions before he can be subjected to pretrial detention without bail under the statute. The background…

Updated:

Appeals Court Rules That Testimony Describing Video Footage Not Provided to Defendant Should Not Have Been Admitted

In a recent decision, Commonwealth v. Connolly, the Appeals Court ruled that testimony from a police officer describing a video that he watched, but that the Commonwealth failed to produce in discovery, should not have been admitted.  In reversing the defendant’s conviction of assault and battery under G. L. c.…

Updated:

SJC Clarifies Trial Court Judge’s Authority to Award Jail Credits

The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. Lydon – clarifying the trial court’s authority to award jail credit to defendants.  In the decision, the Court vacated the judge’s “order denying [the defendant’s] motion for credit for time being served in a house of correction for one…

Updated:

SJC Rules that Public Defenders, Not Judges, Have Independent Authority to Appoint Attorneys to Cases

The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision in a petition filed under G. L. c.211, §3, ruling that the public defender’s office, not judges, have the independent authority to decide who represents indigdent defendants in court. In the decision – Deputy Chief Counsel for the Public Defender Division of CPCS…

Updated:

Appeals Court Issues Decision Clarifying the Definition of “Accredited Preschool” Under School Zone Statute

The Appeals Court recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. Cooper – clarifying what clarifies as an “accredited” preschool for the purposes of G. L. c. 94C, § 32J, the school zone statute. The defendant was convicted of drug distribution of a class E substance, in a school zone. In its…

Contact Us